Posted: 18:13 Mar 24 2004 
i wonder if the tours will be any the more "active" because of that? 
but also eeewwww nasty. they should stick the boys in the black masoleum for a few nights 
Posted: 00:50 Mar 25 2004 Well they broke into the tomb around 2 years ago, this is just the case finally getting to court.
by bipolar
ooooohhhhhh not there?!
Posted: 07:35 Mar 25 2004 
Oh, and eeeeewwww much! Posted: 10:56 Mar 25 2004 Coat, sir?
by Alan
Bloody disgusting!
I've heard of necrophilia but that's dead ridiculous...
Posted: 18:23 Mar 25 2004 well both bipolar and myself know the story of MacKenzie as we've been on that tour more times that can be counted. But as there newspaper article pointed out there were four coffins in his tomb, and something that you will not see in the report was that in his tomb, underneath was also an illegal dumping ground for bodies. The skull in question was not that of Mackenzie himself.
by Byron
(quotes)
"Mackenzie was a prosecutor for Charles the Second and earned the nickname "Bluidy Mackenzie" for vigorously pursuing Covenanters whom he had tortured to gain confessions."
Anyone else note this part of the report? I find myself able to hold back the tears.
Posted: 07:18 Mar 26 2004 ¿Qué?
by Byron
Coat, sir?
Posted: 14:57 Mar 26 2004 Think thats what Byron is reffering too
by Alan
I've heard of necrophilia but that's dead ridiculous...
Posted: 16:05 Mar 26 2004 
Vandalism of historic graves is pretty off whoever's they are I guess, but I think a crown court trial under a centuries old law is a bit OTT! Posted: 19:18 Mar 26 2004 I got it
by Byron
Indeed. Coat, I'll get my coat, from hook ... oh never mind.
Posted: 21:33 Mar 26 2004
Posted: 10:14 Mar 29 2004 
Post a Reply
Back to the Forum
