Post a Reply
Back to the Forum
16.96252% - Geek
Obviously I'd like to be more geeky than that, but that'll do I suppose...
Obviously I'd like to be more geeky than that, but that'll do I suppose...
Posted: 04:50 Apr 03 2004
Geeks
Ya talking to me? I said, are ya talkin' to me?
Well yes actually: www.innergeek.us/geek.html
I scored "4.73373% - Poser" thanks to Buffy and some history doccos, there be hope for me yet.
Well yes actually: www.innergeek.us/geek.html
I scored "4.73373% - Poser" thanks to Buffy and some history doccos, there be hope for me yet.
Posted: 04:50 Apr 03 2004 I got around that as well...did it yesterday afternoon but didn't want to post my result and have it be the highest
by PictureOfFlowers
16.96252% - Geek
Posted: 09:30 Apr 03 2004 
20.51282 - Geek
I lost on techy stuff and gained on TV and written sci-fi, i think. about what i expected
I lost on techy stuff and gained on TV and written sci-fi, i think. about what i expected
Posted: 11:15 Apr 03 2004
13.01775% - Geekish Tendencies - I can live with that
But ould someone please tell me "the odd/even number rule of Star Trek movies" 'cos I'm at a loss and now I'm also curious!!
But ould someone please tell me "the odd/even number rule of Star Trek movies" 'cos I'm at a loss and now I'm also curious!!
Posted: 12:14 Apr 03 2004 If I remember rightly, all odd-numbered Star Trek movies are apparently terrible where as the even-numbered ones are good. Not being a Trekkie (
by Yvonne
But could someone please tell me "the odd/even number rule of Star Trek movies" 'cos I'm at a loss and now I'm also curious!!
) I don't know how much this holds up.
Posted: 13:09 Apr 03 2004
The odd numbered Star Trek films are rubbish, the even numbered are decent, with the exception of course, of Generations, which was VII.
And none of you have any reason to be embarressed, mainly because I just got "60.15779% - Extreme Geek" Which given that you only need 65% to get Geek god...
And none of you have any reason to be embarressed, mainly because I just got "60.15779% - Extreme Geek" Which given that you only need 65% to get Geek god...
Posted: 13:28 Apr 03 2004 
28.40237% - Total Geek
eek! i didn't think i'd score so highly...in fact, i didn't think i'd score in geek terms at all! arrgh!
eek! i didn't think i'd score so highly...in fact, i didn't think i'd score in geek terms at all! arrgh!
Posted: 15:23 Apr 03 2004 
I got 19.52663% - Geek 
(Edited by Alan 03/04/2004 15:32)
(Edited by Alan 03/04/2004 15:32)
Posted: 15:31 Apr 03 2004 Generations sucked..all the odd ones do F.A.C.T!
by Havoc
The odd numbered Star Trek films are rubbish, the even numbered are decent, with the exception of course, of Generations, which was VII.
Posted: 09:49 Apr 04 2004 
Generations was acceptable just because it showed Kirk was harder than Picard!
Posted: 22:54 Apr 04 2004 Sounds like my kind of movie
by Ming
it showed Kirk was harder than Picard!
Posted: 23:04 Apr 04 2004 
Until Bill Shatner's corset snaps, his beer gut pops out from under his shirt, and he wheezes to a halt
Posted: 23:24 Apr 04 2004
Another comment I heard about this was that it was a film about two Captains, one who wore a wig and one who should.
Posted: 02:22 Apr 05 2004 Which seems fair
by Geek Website Thing
38.06706% - Major Geek
Say it loud: 'I'm Geek and I'm proud!'
Posted: 03:18 Apr 05 2004
ahhhhhh <sigh of relief> things could have been worse...
Saw this and almost had an aneurysm;
(knowing how to spell aneurysm doesn't make me any more geeky)
26.42998% - Total Geek
Fortunately there are many here more geeky than I
Saw this and almost had an aneurysm;
(knowing how to spell aneurysm doesn't make me any more geeky)
26.42998% - Total Geek
Fortunately there are many here more geeky than I
Posted: 08:50 Apr 05 2004
16.96252% - Geek
a little higher than i expected, but when your brother is less than five points away from being a geek god i guess some of it rubs off on you
a little higher than i expected, but when your brother is less than five points away from being a geek god i guess some of it rubs off on you
Posted: 13:24 Apr 05 2004